up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000072018

Appellant / Complainant

Naresh Kumar Gupta

VS

Respondent

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

Disputed Amount

12,49,936

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

9 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000072018 by Naresh Kumar Gupta against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 121/03/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the project was completed and more than 80% of lease deeds were executed prior to the enactment of the RERA Act 2016, meaning it did not qualify as an 'ongoing project' and fell outside the purview of the Act.

3
Stage 223/10/2021

Hearing

The court heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent and reserved the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 325/03/2021

Further Order

No text available.

5
Stage 404/02/2021

Further Hearing

The matter was adjourned upon a joint request from both parties and is scheduled for further hearing on 25.03.2021.

6
Stage 504/01/2021

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

7
Stage 627/11/2020

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

8
Stage 7Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000072018-21-03-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the project was completed and more than 80% of lease deeds were executed prior to the enactment of the RERA Act 2016, meaning it did not qualify as an 'ongoing project' and fell outside the purview of the Act.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the project was completed and more than 80% of lease deeds were executed prior to the enactment of the RERA Act 2016, meaning it did not qualify as an 'ongoing project' and fell outside the purview of the Act. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the project was completed and more than 80% of lease deeds were executed prior to the enactment of the RERA Act 2016, meaning it did not qualify as an 'ongoing project' and fell outside the purview of the Act.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(5)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Manish Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Rajesh Chadha

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000072018-21-03-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the project was completed and more than 80% of lease deeds were executed prior to the enactment of the RERA Act 2016, meaning it did not qualify as an 'ongoing project' and fell outside the purview of the Act.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →